Label Thyself First
Written by Billy W on February 6, 2010
If you’re going to be a winning poker player, you must be mastered in the art of deception. And, depending on how good your opponents are, we’re talking deception on many levels. Of course, most winning players are looking for easy money, and playing against people who think about the game and their opponents on any other level than a basic one is a good way to bog down the whole money-making process. So, it’s often just come as you are at the money tables. By this, I mean straightforward ABC poker with a little deception thrown in to throw off any other sharks that might be lurking in the game you’re playing.
But, if you think about it, good poker players are natural born deceivers. No, I don’t mean to imply they’re all of questionable character. Not at all. But, if you’re naturally good at keeping secrets and manipulating others, poker tables are some of the best places I can think of to put such skills to use.
To say that someone is difficult to read, or is just plain unreadable is to say that the person is deeper than most, having many layers that need to be peeled away before discovering his or her true essence. Of course, if you’re a beat cop, you probably need to do a lot of generalizing in order to do your job efficiently. Sitting in a patrol car and trying to think of ways the guy in a business suit walking down this side of the street might be planning some fuckery, while ignoring the guy with tattoos on his neck and fingers, carrying a backpack, and peering into random car windows on the other side of the street is not good police work.
Labeling you’re your peers is a difficult endeavor at best. I mean, how can you feel confidently that you’ve got someone all figured out if that person is your peer? He or she is supposed to be your equal, right? If you think you’ve got the ability to ‘read’ this person like a book, aren’t you really saying that you somehow have an advantage over him or her? Maybe you do have an advantage, possibly through experience.
But what about someone who was once your friend? Or lover? I mean, unless you’re the kind of person who chooses friends or romantic partners based on their susceptibility to being manipulated or deceived, you likely thought at one point that your friends and lovers had at least as much depth and substance as you.
Am I wrong here?
If I’m right, then what the hell gets into some people to make them think they’ve got their friends or lovers all figured out? Isn’t that just the height of arrogance?
Isn’t it?
Posted in: Journal










